Skip to content
Back to selected work Security Intelligence

Twice-daily OSINT briefing workflow

A public-source monitoring workflow that helped a security team turn scattered feeds into clear, shareable intelligence updates.

Built around public-source monitoring, structured watchlists, and repeatable briefing outputs.

City and data monitoring environment representing a security intelligence workflow.

Executive summary

A security team needed a faster way to monitor public sources, reduce duplicate checking, and produce updates stakeholders could actually use. Nine Signals built a twice-daily OSINT briefing workflow using public feeds, APIs, and structured watchlists.

Context

Security teams often work across too many sources. Feeds, alerts, public records, weather, travel updates, local incidents, and asset mentions all sit in different places.

The problem is not always a lack of information. Often, it is the opposite. Too much public noise. Too many duplicate checks. Too much time spent deciding what matters.

Problem

The team needed a more repeatable way to monitor relevant public sources and turn useful signals into briefings that could be shared quickly.

The existing process depended on manual checking, repeated searches, and people remembering where to look. That made the work slower than it needed to be and harder to repeat consistently.

What was built

Nine Signals built a public-source monitoring workflow using RSS feeds, APIs, GDELT, and structured watchlists.

The workflow was designed to pull relevant signals into a more useful format, group them around operational priorities, and produce a twice-daily briefing.

How the workflow worked

  1. Public sources were monitored for relevant mentions and updates.
  2. Watchlists were structured around assets, people, places, travel, weather, and threat signals.
  3. The workflow filtered noise and grouped useful findings.
  4. Outputs were turned into a clear briefing format.
  5. The team received repeatable updates they could review and share.

Outcome

The workflow reduced manual checking, improved briefing consistency, and made useful intelligence easier to share with stakeholders.

It supported monitoring across a portfolio of assets without forcing the team to keep checking the same sources by hand.

Operational context

This workflow supported monitoring across a portfolio with more than $54m in assets.

Why it mattered

The value was not just automation. The value was turning repeated monitoring work into a clearer operating rhythm.

Less time checking. More consistent briefings. Clearer updates. Better visibility.